For education
Your students are using AI to cheat on computer-based exams, in the classroom and at home. You just can't prove it yet.
ScreenComply helps schools, universities and testing organizations trust computer-based exams and assessments, in-person or remote, with clear evidence and human review.
Defensible evidence for integrity hearings · Canvas, Zoom & Meet integrations
This is what you're up against
See Why Assessment Integrity Matters.
Keep your existing exam tools and give academic reviewers the evidence they need to make fair decisions.
Tap to play · Assessment integrity examples
ScreenComply works alongside your existing exam tools so your team can review integrity concerns with clear evidence.
Trustworthy assessment results with clear evidence for human review, alongside the tools you already use.
Evidence for human review
Three review layers. One informed decision.
Give academic reviewers clear evidence for fair exam and assessment decisions.
Application Review
TRUSTWORTHY RESULTS
Review-ready reports provide the context your team needs to make a fair decision.
WHAT YOUR TEAM GETS
- Defensible documentation supports your existing review and governance process.
- Keep the tools you already run and add evidence your reviewers can use.
- Human review keeps decisions with your team, not the software.
- Consistent reports help your team address integrity concerns with context.
- Give academic reviewers clear evidence for fair exam and assessment decisions.
Video Review
CLEAR EVIDENCE
Review-ready reports provide the context your team needs to make a fair decision.
WHAT YOUR TEAM GETS
- Human review
- Decision reviewer
- Human review keeps decisions with your team, not the software.
- Consistent reports help your team address integrity concerns with context.
- Unexpected second voice and ambient audio analysis catch off-camera coaching
- Give academic reviewers clear evidence for fair exam and assessment decisions.
Content Review
HUMAN REVIEW
Review-ready reports provide the context your team needs to make a fair decision.
WHAT YOUR TEAM GETS
- Defensible documentation supports your existing review and governance process.
- Keep the tools you already run and add evidence your reviewers can use.
- Human review keeps decisions with your team, not the software.
- Consistent reports help your team address integrity concerns with context.
- Give academic reviewers clear evidence for fair exam and assessment decisions.
The solution
Defensible Evidence for Academic Review.
Defensible documentation supports your existing review and governance process.
Application Review
Clear evidence helps your team review the integrity of an assessment.
Video Review
Keep the tools you already run and add evidence your reviewers can use.
Integrity reports
Auto-generated, audit-ready reports with evidence tables for academic review boards.
Privacy-first
Human review keeps decisions with your team, not the software.
Scales to thousands
Support your exam program with consistent evidence for human review.
Built for education
Designed for the specific compliance and governance needs of academic institutions.
What your team gets
Clear Evidence. Ready for Human Review.
Consistent reports help your team address integrity concerns with context.
Application Review
EVIDENCE FOR INFORMED DECISIONSGive academic reviewers clear evidence for fair exam and assessment decisions.
Review-ready reports provide the context your team needs to make a fair decision.
Defensible documentation supports your existing review and governance process.
Keep the tools you already run and add evidence your reviewers can use.
Decision Confidence
PREVENTING "SOMEONE ELSE TAKES THE TEST"Clear evidence helps reviewers make informed decisions.
Human review keeps decisions with your team, not the software.
Defensible documentation supports a fair assessment review.
Give reviewers clear evidence and context for informed decisions.
Review Context
WHAT THE USER IS DOING DURING THE SESSIONGive reviewers clear context for a fair, informed decision.
Consistent reports help your team address integrity concerns with context.
Give academic reviewers clear evidence for fair exam and assessment decisions.
Review-ready reports provide the context your team needs to make a fair decision.
Defensible documentation supports your existing review and governance process.
Keep the tools you already run and add evidence your reviewers can use.
Human review keeps decisions with your team, not the software.
Consistent reports help your team address integrity concerns with context.
Assessment Integrity
CONSISTENT REVIEW CONTEXTEvidence supports consistent review across assessment stages.
Give academic reviewers clear evidence for fair exam and assessment decisions.
Agree the assessment review plan before the session starts.
Review-ready reports provide the context your team needs to make a fair decision.
Compliance & Governance
EVERY SESSION PRODUCES A TAMPER-EVIDENT REPORT WITH CHAIN OF CUSTODYService-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business - parent entity Guardian Robotics Contracting, Inc.
Security and compliance documentation is shared after an introductory call. Controls are designed to satisfy enterprise documentation, audit and governance requirements.
Defensible documentation supports your existing review and governance process.
Evidence informs decisions; your team makes the call.
Keep the tools you already run and add evidence your reviewers can use.
Your data, your rules
Fully flexible data retention and privacy controls.
ScreenComply adapts to your organization's data governance requirements, from zero retention to full archival.
From read-only to full retention
Human review keeps decisions with your team, not the software.
Evidence-backed assessments
Consistent reports help your team address integrity concerns with context.
Customer-first integration
Every deployment is configured to your privacy requirements, data residency needs, and integration architecture. We work with your legal, IT, and compliance teams to fit ScreenComply into your existing governance framework - not the other way around.
Privacy by design
Security and compliance documentation is shared after an introductory call. Discuss security and governance requirements with our team.
Results
Universities using ScreenComply see results in weeks, not semesters.
For academic integrity officers, CISOs, and teaching-and-learning leaders
Built to fit the processes your institution already runs.
ScreenComply is an integrity layer, not another exam platform. It runs alongside the lockdown browser or proctoring tool you already license, in the classroom and remotely, inside the LMS your faculty already use, and produces evidence your misconduct process can actually work with.
Fits Your Canvas Workflow
Use ScreenComply alongside Canvas to give faculty clear evidence for human review. Our team helps you set up an approach that fits your existing assessment workflow.
Evidence for misconduct processes
Every session produces a timestamped, audit-ready integrity report written for human review. Findings are presented as observations with the detail a committee needs when a student challenges them. Nothing is decided automatically and no student is punished by the system.
Accessibility taken seriously
ScreenComply targets WCAG 2.1 AA conformance, and a VPAT is available for procurement and accessibility review. Accommodation workflows stay with your institution; the integrity layer does not override them.
Runs alongside your current tools
Give academic reviewers clear evidence for fair exam and assessment decisions.
Security and data governance
Configurable retention from full archival to read-only sessions with no data written to disk, encryption in transit and at rest, and data governance terms your CISO and privacy office can review. Security and compliance documentation is shared after an introductory call.
Rollout without a semester-long project
Start with one department or one high-stakes exam cycle. No campus-wide software rollout is required to run a meaningful pilot.
Get started
Stop guessing. Start proving.
Deploy ScreenComply before your next exam or assessment cycle and give your academic integrity office the evidence-based tools they need.