ScreenComply vs Sherlock AI
ScreenComply supports trustworthy interview results with clear evidence for human review. Compare the review outcomes that fit your team.
| Comparison | Sherlock AI | ScreenComply |
|---|---|---|
| Where it runs | A candidate desktop application for its full interview coverage; meeting-based workflows are also described. | Device-level desktop agent; browser API for platform workflows. |
| What it can see | Public pages describe interview flags for AI copilots and proxy-candidate concerns. Do not assume it is browser-only. | Whole-device session evidence: desktop AI assistants, overlays, remote access and second devices. Coverage depends on the enabled session policy. |
| What the reviewer receives | Interview reports and flagged results for human review. | An evidence timeline a person reviews. Your team makes the decision. |
| How it integrates | Meeting and calendar workflows, including Zoom and Microsoft Teams, plus an API. | LMS, meeting platforms and assessment platforms through an API. |
| How it deploys | An additional interview-integrity layer alongside existing meeting workflows. | A proctoring layer alongside existing tools, or your primary proctoring layer. |
Competitor descriptions reflect their public pages as of October 2026, not independent capability testing. Products and configurations change; confirm current scope with the vendor.