Remote certification exams
Add device-level evidence beside the delivery platform used at home.
Certification and Credentialing
Protect the value of every credential you issue.
A certification program needs confidence that its exam reflects the candidate’s own work. AI assistance outside the browser can undermine that confidence in remote and in-person testing alike. ScreenComply adds device-level evidence and a choice of Prevent or Detect alongside the delivery platform already in use.
A credential is only worth what its exam proves.
How does ScreenComply fit your exam program?
ScreenComply runs on the candidate’s device or the test-center machine alongside the delivery platform the program already uses. Choose Prevent or Detect per exam, and send the evidence into the program’s own review process. Programs delivering through an assessment vendor can discuss the assessment-platform API as part of that workflow.
The integrity layer should fit the exam program rather than create a separate set of credentialing rules. Agree the permitted tools, candidate notice, reviewer responsibilities and escalation route before deployment. The program retains its decisions about eligibility, exam outcomes and what a flagged observation means under its rules.
Where does it show up?
Test-center computers
Support computer-based exams on the machine used by the candidate.
Recertification and continuing education
Apply the program’s policy to assessments that maintain a credential.
Practice assessments
Evaluate the evidence and review workflow before a credentialing exam.
Why is browser visibility not enough?
An exam can look normal within a browser while assistance is active beside it. A lockdown environment controls the part of the assessment it was designed to manage, but that view does not necessarily explain the whole session. This gap matters whether a candidate is at home or seated at a test-center computer.
ScreenComply complements existing controls with evidence for review at the device level. The aim is not to replace a well-run exam program or promise certainty from an isolated observation. It is to give the program a record that supports a fair assessment when a session raises questions.
What does your exam program receive?
Your team receives timestamped evidence and session context for a person to review. Reviewers can consider the observation alongside the permitted-tool policy and any approved arrangement, then apply the program’s own decision process. A flag is not an automatic failure or a withdrawal of a credential.
A useful review workflow identifies who is responsible for considering the evidence and who can make the final program decision. Candidates should know how to provide an explanation and where to raise a concern about the process. Keep the evidence connected to that review rather than relying on an unexplained score.
What should candidates expect?
Candidates should receive clear preparation instructions and notice about the assessment session before starting. In Detect, activity is recorded for later review without blocking tools. In Prevent, restricted tools are closed before use and a plain warning explains the intervention. The program should state which mode applies to the exam.
Provide a support route for a required application, an accessibility arrangement or a device that is not ready. A warning or setup problem should be addressed without assuming misconduct. The candidate continues in the exam delivery workflow, while the program remains responsible for policy and any subsequent review.
What should procurement review?
Start procurement with the proposed assessment workflow, the machines candidates will use and the way evidence reaches your reviewers. The Trust Center links security, privacy and accessibility material for that discussion. Confirm the documents required by your program and the assessment delivery agreement before deploying.
Data handling questions belong with the program’s privacy and procurement reviewers. Use the Trust Center to review the proposed arrangement instead of inferring a certification or retention promise from marketing language. The exam program should explain its notice, access and review process to candidates.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does it work with our existing exam delivery vendor?
ScreenComply can run alongside the delivery platform already in use, with an assessment-platform API path for programs delivering through a vendor. Review the proposed configuration and evidence handoff with our team and the assessment owner before deployment.
Can it run in a test center?
Yes, the program can use ScreenComply on the test-center machine where the candidate takes a computer-based exam. Agree the machine preparation, session mode and support responsibilities with the exam program in advance.
What does a candidate see?
The candidate receives notice and uses the existing exam delivery workflow. Detect records activity for review without blocking tools; Prevent displays a plain warning when a restricted tool needs to close.
Who makes the final decision on a flagged session?
The certification or credentialing program makes the final decision through its own review process. ScreenComply supplies evidence and context, not an automatic exam failure or credentialing verdict.
How is candidate data handled?
Review the Trust Center with the exam program for the data handling applicable to your assessment.
Bring your assessment and review process.
Discuss the evidence your reviewers need, the candidate experience and the policy that guides a human decision.