ScreenComply vs Fabric HQ
Compare the interview workflow described on Fabric HQ public pages with the device-level evidence and human review provided by ScreenComply.
| Comparison | Fabric HQ | ScreenComply |
|---|---|---|
| Where it runs | An AI interview workflow. Universal candidate-side installation requirements are not established by the cited pages. | Device-level desktop agent; browser API for platform workflows. |
| What it can see | The cited public pages describe hiring interviews and assessment tasks, not equivalent whole-device exam-proctoring coverage. | Whole-device session evidence: desktop AI assistants, overlays, remote access and second devices. Coverage depends on the enabled session policy. |
| What the reviewer receives | Interview recordings, assessments and candidate reports. | An evidence timeline a person reviews. Your team makes the decision. |
| How it integrates | Hiring systems, communication and calendar integrations. | LMS, meeting platforms and assessment platforms through an API. |
| How it deploys | An interview workflow connected to the hiring stack. The cited pages do not establish an exam-lockdown replacement. | A proctoring layer alongside existing tools, or your primary proctoring layer. |
Competitor descriptions reflect their public pages as of October 2026, not independent capability testing. Products and configurations change; confirm current scope with the vendor.
Integrity, not just intelligence
See clear evidence and context for informed hiring decisions.