Platform partnership guide
How to Add an Integrity Layer to Your Assessment Platform
ScreenComply supports trustworthy results by reviewing the whole session and flagging concerns for human review, with evidence attached.
Why platforms are being asked for this now
Assessment platforms increasingly field the same question from enterprise and institutional buyers: how do you know the person completed this without AI assistance? Native webcam proctoring and browser lockdown answer part of it, but neither observes the desktop assistants and overlay tools buyers are actually worried about.
Building that observation layer in-house means shipping and maintaining a signed desktop agent across Windows and macOS, tracking a fast-moving list of assistant applications, and defending detection methodology to procurement teams. For most platforms that is not the roadmap they want to own.
How the integration works
ScreenComply supports trustworthy results by reviewing the whole session and flagging concerns for human review, with evidence attached.
White-label and commercial models
ScreenComply supports white-label deployment: your brand on the candidate experience and on the report, with ScreenComply operating as the underlying detection infrastructure. Commercial arrangements include per-session pricing, platform-wide licensing, and revenue-share structures where integrity is sold as a premium tier to your own customers.
The common pattern is a paid integrity tier: standard assessments stay as they are, and high-stakes assessments carry a per-session integrity charge that the platform prices and keeps a share of. Specific terms are worked out per partner rather than published.
It runs alongside your native proctoring
ScreenComply supports trustworthy results by reviewing the whole session and flagging concerns for human review, with evidence attached.
Platforms that already ship proctoring generally position the ScreenComply tier as the option for high-stakes, credentialing, or regulated assessments rather than replacing the default experience.
What device-level detection observes
ScreenComply supports trustworthy results by reviewing the whole session and flagging concerns for human review, with evidence attached.
Turning signals into a report someone can defend
ScreenComply supports trustworthy results by reviewing the whole session and flagging concerns for human review, with evidence attached.
Language is deliberately factual rather than accusatory, because the institution or employer makes the decision, not the software. Reports export to PDF and can be shared through a secure link for academic-integrity hearings, HR reviews, and compliance audits, with configurable retention including zero-retention operating modes.
Where to go next
Frequently asked questions
How long does integration take?
A wrapped launch-link integration is typically a small amount of work on the platform side: create a session, redirect the candidate, and consume the report through the API or a webhook. Deeper embedded integrations take longer and are scoped per partner.
Can the integrity layer be fully white-labelled?
Yes. The candidate experience and the report can carry the platform's brand, with ScreenComply operating as the underlying infrastructure.
Does this conflict with the proctoring we already ship?
ScreenComply supports trustworthy results by reviewing the whole session and flagging concerns for human review, with evidence attached.
What are the commercial terms?
Per-session pricing, platform licensing, and revenue-share structures are all supported. Terms are agreed per partner rather than published.
What is ScreenComply's compliance posture for partner due diligence?
Security and compliance documentation is shared after an introductory call. Retention is configurable including zero-retention modes, and ScreenComply is under contract with the State of Montana. No other certification claims are made.
ScreenComply is under contract with the State of Montana. Security and compliance documentation is shared after an introductory call.
See a session, a detection, and a report
A short walkthrough of the evidence reports and review experience your team would receive.